On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 2:39 PM, Christophe Grand <christo...@cgrand.net>wrote:
> Right now I can't see how loop can be made to support both cases. > Hopefully someone else will. In the meantime, remember that it's always worth trying to implement seq-processing in terms of map, reduce, filter, for, and friends if possible, or lazy-seq, before resorting to loop/recur. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
