> I would propose no changes to Clojure, no > conditional compilation techniques or reader modifications. Just > things like macros that have simple functionality and that at most > check one flag to conditionalize output.
I wouldn't immediately object to reader macro conditionalization here. Imagining each port of Clojure to be like a different Lisp implementation (yes, I know, it's not), one sees this all the time: #+:sbcl (defun foo (x) (bar)) #-:sbcl (defun foo (x) (noz)) It's not a big stretch to imagine that being #+:clojure-clr and # +:clojure-jvm. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
