On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 7:27 PM, Paul Mooser <taron...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Ah -- I hadn't understood that when using destructuring, that > subsequent bindings could refer to the destructured elements. I should > have, since clojure "only" has let*, and this behavior seems > consistent with that, for binding. > > Eeww. It seems like quite a thorny issue to solve, even if simple to > describe.
Well, in truth, there's a way to fix the loop macro but it is too ugly: the idea is to wrap the outer let in a closure and replace the loop by a function, thus we could benefit from the locals clearing on tail call. The real solution would be pervasive locals clearing but I seem to remember Rich saying he'd like to delay such work until clojure in clojure. > What's the procedure for creating a ticket for this? Is it at least > acknowledged that this IS a bug? It's better to wait for Rich's opinion on this problem before creating a ticket. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
