On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 04:49:16PM +0000, Emeka wrote: >What is the gain of using lazy-seq here? Why can't we go without laziness?
- The lazy version doesn't consume stack per length of the sequence. - The lazy version works with unbounded sequences. For short sequences it probably doesn't matter much, but these are also probably the cases where performance isn't as much of a concern. David --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
