On Nov 9, 6:42 pm, David Brown <cloj...@davidb.org> wrote: > And gives very different results. 'for' iterates over it's sequences > in a nested fasion. For your particular example, it will return the > sequence from (+ 31 1) (+ 31 2) and so on, and never get to the second > element of the first vector. > > 'let-map' walks through the sequences together, like 'map', hence the > name. The given 'let-map' example returns a sequence of 4 elements.
Ah, of course; thanks. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
