> Right, strings and vectors can be thought of as either collections, or > as associative mappings from integers to characters/objects. > contains? treats them as associative mappings. Yes, it's unintuitive, > but it has a certain degree of internal consistency.
This certainly encourages you to use sets whenever you want, um, set- like behavior... --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
