Warren Wood <warrenthomasw...@yahoo.com> writes: > Thought of this, which I like better. Again, I'm surprised if > conjunction is not already a standard function, but I can't find it. > I'm still a bit tempted to call it AND for readabilty of code. (I > spent some time studying combinatory logic back in the day. (I even > had a "Curry Fellowship" at Penn State where Haskell Curry used to > work.) Can't remember what combinator letter my "dual" function is.) > > (defn dual [x] (fn [f] (f x))) > > (defn conjunction [& preds] > (fn [x] (every? (dual x) preds))) > > (filter > (conjunction even? (partial >= 16) (partial <= 9)) > (range 1 20))
for cases like this you can also leverage reader macros (filter #(and (even? %) (>= 16 %) (<= 9 %)) (range 1 20)) -- jan -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
