On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 4:49 AM, ajuc <aju...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 15 Lis, 00:21, John Harrop <jharrop...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 3:03 PM, ajuc <aju...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > I have to install java one more time, when I try to start java -
> > > server, I get:
> > > Error: no `server' JVM at `F:\Program Files\Java\jre6\bin\server
> > > \jvm.dll
> >
> > You need to use the one in F:\Program Files\Java\jdk6 instead.
> >
> > I'm surprised your IDE didn't select that one automatically. Mine
> > (Enclojure) did.
>
> My IDE is waterfront, and it just starts java, and in my path the
> first java was jre, I've changed that, problem solved, thanks.
>
> What's intresting, when I run the code in java -server, the difference
> between using global, and using literal map expression in let got
> bigger.
>

That's very odd.

Rich needs to take a look at this. Letting a constant shouldn't have a
performance hit, IMO.

Could you test whether it's faster to use your complex data structure
directly in the function, anonymously at the point of use, or to yank it
from a global var?

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

Reply via email to