Hi, On Nov 16, 10:24 am, Laurent PETIT <laurent.pe...@gmail.com> wrote:
> This deserves to be placed in contrib, in my opinion. In fact it could be used to drive defnk. So defnk could be retained as a convenience (and for backward compatibility) expanding to (defn ... (fn-keyword ...)). +1 to some different name, though. eg. with-keyword-arguments More random notes: (apply hash-map (interleave key-seq val-seq)) can be written as (zipmap key-seq val-seq). I'm not sure I like the clever interface :kw or [:kw default] or [:kw default bound?]. Maybe it is trying to do too much? Is bound? really thaaat interesting? Is it interesting to allow also map for kw-args? Sincerely Meikel -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
