I'm not sure either what you mean by "abstraction level", but I would say that I tend more to think about abstraction level to be at function definition level.
2009/12/10 ngocdaothanh <ngocdaoth...@gmail.com> > Hi, > > I want to ask about code arrangement and understandability > (readability). > > Consider this "normal" code: > x = 1 > ... > f(x) > ... > y = x + 2 > ... > g(y) > > x, f, y, g have the same "abstractness" level, so they are indented to > the same level. > > My Clojure code: > (let [x 1] > ... > (f x) > ... > (let [y (+ x 2)] > ... > (g y))) > > It is very difficult to capture the "algorithm" behind the Clojure > code because things of the same "abstractness" level do not have the > same indent level. > > How to rearrange the Clojure code for understandability? > > I have been studying Clojure for several months now but I could never > "get" it. But I couldn't explain why I couldn't get it, I just didn't > know why. But today I think I have found the reason: I think the > problem of Clojure (and Lisp) is not parenthesis, its problem is > indent. > > I think if I can "let over" this problem, I will be enlightened. Would > you please help me? > > Thank you, > Ngoc > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > your first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<clojure%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com> > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
