Currently, if the result of the multiplication is too small, then the type will be double, despite the fact that one of the parameter was BigDecimal:
Clojure 1.1.0 user=> (* 100M 1.1) 110.00000000000001 user=> (class (* 100M 1.1)) java.lang.Double Such thing are really hard to find and this can be easily produced by non-technical person, if he is using some kind of DSL which is based on Clojure. Shoudn't it be BigDecimal instead? Wbr, Jevgeni
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
