I've got no clue, so I would just do the experiment. If it works out
well, tell us why. If it's a disaster, tell us what didn't work.
Sean
On Feb 7, 3:57 pm, James Reeves <weavejes...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Would those more knowledgable about Clojure care to weigh in on
> whether it be a good idea to create a custom class inheriting from
> IDeref? I've been considering creating session proxy objects (to be
> later replaced with protocols) that would respond to deref calls, e.g.
>
> (def session
> (proxy [IDeref] []
> (deref [this]
> (read-session (.store this)))
> (store [this]
> {:type ::memory-store})))
>
> Is this a good idea, or is it considered bad practice to use IDeref in
> anything apart from core Clojure concurrently primitives?
>
> - James
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
