Hello Joshua, I don't think there is an official standard in Clojure, at least not yet. For a source of inspiration, you may be interested in this thread, in case you haven't found it yourself yet:
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure-dev/browse_thread/thread/d090b5599909497c Personally, I prefer to annotate functions that have specific meaning (like being a filter function used in templates, or a widget that spits out HTML) with a tag that explicitely states what they are (be it metadata in Clojure, or a decorator in Python which sets a specific instance variable on the function object) so functions of a kind can be programmatically queried at runtime (e.g., "give me all widgets in this namespace"). Regarding tests, in the Clojure code I've seen so far, people haven't used any specific notation, probably since tests are usually split off from the rest of the source anyway. Actually I had to smirk while reading your post, because only a few weeks ago I browsed your fnparse project's git repository out of interest. Looking at your "renaming" branch where you started adding underscores to the most important rule building functions, I just thought "what the heck is he doing here, and why?". So, generally I find _underscore_ naming to be less readable, especially when these names are being used regularly throughout the code, and avoid it myself. (Unless it is forced by language conventions, like __init__ and __repr__ etc. in Python.) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
