On 23.03.2010, at 18:26, Quzanti wrote: > I say that because my first thought is if you could build a logic > language on top of LISP then would prolog be needed as the other AI > language?
Why do we need the hundreds of programming languages we have? We don't. It's just that different people have different ideas of what makes a language useful. Practically speaking, the main advantage of Prolog is probably that optimizing compilers have been developed for quite some time. Logic programming systems in Lisp (and other languages) will probably never catch up with that, for lack of manpower. Konrad. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscribegooglegroups.com or reply to this email with the words "REMOVE ME" as the subject.
