Hi, On Mar 24, 2:22 am, Douglas Philips <d...@mac.com> wrote:
> would (let [s1 (first seq1) > s1tail (rest seq1)] ...) > be any better? rest says it calls seq on its argument, and that would > force as well? > Hmmm... So only things like map are able to realize first without > realizing (first (rest seq1)) too? No. Understand the difference between next and rest. Sincerely Meikel -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscribegooglegroups.com or reply to this email with the words "REMOVE ME" as the subject.
