On Apr 6, 2010, at 6:08 PM, Sophie wrote: > Don't you think > - fixed-order named parameters > could (should?) be a separate issue from > - optional, any-order, named parameters > ?
I don't see the advantage of fixed-order named parameters over keyword parameters. Note that you can require certain keyword parameters simply by throwing an exception when they're omitted. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en To unsubscribe, reply using "remove me" as the subject.
