On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 3:16 AM, TimDaly <[email protected]> wrote:
> This might be interesting when the discussion of events vs threads
> comes up:
> http://www.usenix.org/events/hotos03/tech/full_papers/vonbehren/vonbehren_html/
>
> Essentially they argue that thread programming can scale (100k
> threads?)

This is about threads for concurrency as opposed to threads for parallelism.

Sure, they can scale. Erlang and Haskell can easily cope with that
many user-land threads. The first versions of the JVM also had green
threads, though the implementation was never designed to scale so
highly.

-Per

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

Reply via email to