+1, I am also using this feature of the old deftype. On Apr 22, 12:15 pm, Konrad Hinsen <konrad.hin...@fastmail.net> wrote: > On 22.04.2010, at 18:53, Rich Hickey wrote: > > > Feedback and errata welcome as always, > > One feature in the deftype/defrecord split that I regret is that defrecord no > longer allows the redefinition of equals and hashCode. Any attempt to > override those results in an error message about duplicate method definitions. > > I have several former deftypes that are a perfect fit for the new defrecord, > except that they need a specific comparison function. This is usually for > excluding some fields from equality testing, or for requiring identity rather > than equality for some fields. > > As it is, I must convert all these to the new deftype, losing the convient > field access through keywords. > > Konrad. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group.To post to this group, send email > tocloj...@googlegroups.com > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your > first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email > toclojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group > athttp://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
