Thank you all so much!! As always, I learn a lot from this forum. On May 18, 12:50 am, Jarkko Oranen <chous...@gmail.com> wrote: > On May 18, 2:23 am, Base <basselh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > (defn lazy-date-seq [d1 d2] > > (let [start (-> d1 > > (.dayOfMonth) > > (.withMinimumValue))] > > (lazy-seq > > (cons start > > (if (joda/before? start d2) > > (lazy-date-seq (.plusMonths start 1) d2)))))) > > > The lazy version worked like a champ and appears (to me) to be more in > > the vain of Lisp (with a touch of Haskell). > > Is the author of the blog correct about using lazy seq in this way? > > Assuming that he is correct and I converted date-seq to a loop/recur > > format to use TCO, would one of these be preferable over the other in > > terms of idiomatic clojure? > > The lazy version is more idiomatic. By default, you should make > sequences lazy unless there is a compelling reason to do otherwise. > > In this case it also avoids the stack building problem that the > recursive version has. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group.To post to this group, send email > tocloj...@googlegroups.com > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your > first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email > toclojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group > athttp://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
