On May 18, 10:27 am, David Nolen <dnolen.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 10:18 AM, braver <delivera...@gmail.com> wrote: > The documentation is pretty clear about how pmap works. Your work needs to > be greater than the coordination overhead. You probably need to batch your > work before trying to call pmap.
David -- note that loop outperforms every? by 4x without pmap. So forget pmap, we know it's overhead-y, why does every? lose? -- Alexy -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
