That is a very useful bit of information. Thanks!

On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 6:01 AM, Moritz Ulrich
<ulrich.mor...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Slime supports redirecting the inferior-lisp-output to the repl:
>
> Add
>
> (add-hook 'slime-connected-hook 'slime-redirect-inferior-output)
>
> to your .emacs
>
> On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 4:39 AM, Dave Fayram <dfay...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> It doesn't suppress output, it just doesn't propagate it to your repl
>> buffer. Check for that output in your *inferior-lisp* buffer; it
>> should be faithfully reproduced there.
>>
>> You might want to consider using an alternative means of logging in
>> the future. Perhaps an agent that buffers lines.
>>
>> - dlf
>>
>> On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 6:26 PM, Preecha P <yum...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I tried to play around with thread with these lines of code. It should
>>> print the value of variable but it doesn't..
>>>
>>> In emacs.
>>> user> (def x 5)
>>> #'user/x
>>> user> x
>>> 5
>>> user> (import [java.lang Thread])
>>> java.lang.Thread
>>> user> (.start (Thread. (fn [] (print x))))
>>> nil
>>>
>>>
>>> or with agent
>>> user> (def foo (agent 0))
>>> #'user/foo
>>> user> foo
>>> #<ag...@6af2f0d0: 0>
>>> user> (send foo (fn[num] (do (println num) (inc num))))
>>> #<ag...@6af2f0d0: 0>
>>>
>>> I ran the exact same code in command-line and the thread could print
>>> the output fine.
>>>
>>> Clojure 1.1.0-master-SNAPSHOT
>>> user=> (def foo (agent 0))
>>> #'user/foo
>>> user=> foo
>>> #<ag...@194835fb: 0>
>>> user=> (send foo (fn[num] (do (println num) (inc num) )))
>>> 0
>>> #<ag...@194835fb: 0>
>>>
>>> I installed everything from elpa, so I guess some of the component
>>> might gone wrong. Any idea ?
>>>
>>> thanks.
>>>
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "Clojure" group.
>>> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
>>> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with 
>>> your first post.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> --
>> Dave Fayram
>> dfay...@gmail.com
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> Groups "Clojure" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
>> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
>> first post.
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Clojure" group.
> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
> first post.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en



-- 
-- 
Dave Fayram
dfay...@gmail.com

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

Reply via email to