On Wed, 26 May 2010 19:47:25 +0200
Peter Schuller <peter.schul...@infidyne.com> wrote:
> > chomp => rtrim
> > (rtrim "foo\n") => "foo" is much more clear to me, plus it leaves the
> > door open for trim and ltrim functions should the need arise.
>
> I like this. And in general I often fine the entire trio useful, and
> adopting the ltrim/trim/rtrim naming makes it nice and tidy.
>
> While I recognize the perl (or whatever the original is) precedent
> from chomp/chop, there is precedent for trim/left trim/right trim too.
> What *would* one call trim/ltrim to make them consistent with chomp?
Personally, I like the lstrip/strip/rstrip, but that's just because
I'm used to them.
<mike
--
Mike Meyer <m...@mired.org> http://www.mired.org/consulting.html
Independent Network/Unix/Perforce consultant, email for more information.
O< ascii ribbon campaign - stop html mail - www.asciiribbon.org
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
