On Jun 3, 2010, at 24:02 , rzeze...@gmail.com wrote: > I was able to make this go away by adding a method to Numbers.java. I > have a use case where I'm calling bit-and with two longs tens of > millions of times. Is there another way I could avoid this reflection > without this change to the Java source? >
The only way to avoid it without changing the java code is to box it (bit-and (Long/valueOf (long 0x1)) (Long/valueOf (long 0x1))) or (bit-and (num (long 0x1)) (num (long 0x1))) I had a similar patch, because I did not wanted to box. I've also noticed that short and byte are totally missing from the Numbers.java. I can put together a patch for short, byte and missing long cases. Would it be something useful? _ __ | \o/__ |_/|\_| -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
