Hi, Am 16.06.2010 um 22:34 schrieb Christophe Grand:
> I agree, it still feels a little dirty to use a future without caring > about the return value but on the positive said you get an easy way to > block and wait for the tread to finish (deref) and you also get > future-done?, future-cancel and future-cancelled which can prove > useful. True. This infrastructure is an incentive to use future. Maybe one can wash away the dirty feeling by believing, that deref'ing is actually a syncronisation point of sorts and the return value just a "side-effect". Sincerely Meikel -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
