Thanks for both the replies.
(get-in m [:key1 :item1 :sub1]) <------- YUM ;)
(-> stuff :key1 :item1 sub1)
are better than what I've been doing!
Re: (next...)
I still like mine better, fortunately I can create my own functions,
but I was just highlighted that some of the function names are not
intuitive (to me).
Most of them are good.
Along this vein, I find the documentation is great, but a little hard
to navigate around.
Example to find a list of predicates requires hunting. Is there a
trick? I know ' source' and 'find-doc', but I'm constantly
searching :)
This is a really niggly point since relatively speaking it's well
done.
As I said, I'm green. I'll get there soon I promise :)
Tim
On Jun 24, 1:48 pm, Meikel Brandmeyer <m...@kotka.de> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am 24.06.2010 um 21:12 schrieb Tim Robinson:
>
> > I would like some chaining to less the brackets.
> > i.e.
>
> >> (def stuff {:key1 {:item1 {:sub1 val1}})
> >> (((stuff :key1) :item1) sub1) <------- YUCK
> > val1
>
> > Instead do this:
> >> stuff:key1:item1:sub1
> > val1
>
> (-> stuff :key1 :item1 sub1)
>
> > Also, some of the function names don't make sense:
> > (def stuff (list 1 2 3 4 5))
> >> (rest stuff)
> > (2 3 4 5)
> >> (next stuff)
> > (2 3 4 5) <---- this can be done with rest.
>
> next and rest are not the same. Seehttp://clojure.org/lazy.
>
> Sincerely
> Meikel
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
