On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 10:50 PM, Mark Engelberg <mark.engelb...@gmail.com>wrote:
> With respect to this particular benchmark, I don't think it will be > possible to get idiomatic code in the same ballpark as Java, because > if you use Clojure's vectors to store the permuted values, they will > be boxed. Unless Clojure starts having primitive vectors, I don't see > how it's possible to get around this. But I'd love to be proven > wrong. gvec already holds primitives. What we're missing are fns that can take advantage of that. David -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
