On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 3:09 PM, David Nolen <dnolen.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 8:44 AM, Anders Rune Jensen > <anders.rune.jen...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Very interesting! >> >> I've been following the thread with great interest and did a quick >> performance test today comparing standard compojure with jetty against >> aleph and netty. I get around 4500 req/s with compojure and 3500 req/s >> with aleph. The test was as simple as possible, just return hello >> world. > > I'm curious how you ran that test. With ab running 10 clients for 1 second I > see ~4000-5000 req/s using Compojure 0.4.0. With aleph I see ~8000-9000 > req/s. I also had a quick chat with Zach Tellman and it sounds like he > hasn't done much in the way of optimizing (few Java type hints), so we'll > likely see the aleph numbers go up.
Yeah I was possitive that the numbers were quite good for aleph considering it's such a young project. But I was expecting netty to beat jetty, so I was a little disappointed :) I just ran the test as simple as possible: java -server (no others paramters set), default kernel settings (Ubuntu) and then using ab -n 5000 -c 50 (as in your blog post). As always with java, one needs to run ab a few times before the number stabilize :) The test machine was an old intel c2 duo 2 GHz. > David -- Anders Rune Jensen -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
