On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 11:45 AM, Quzanti <quza...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Thanks Michał > > You did understand my intention, and it was the former non-existent > case I was referring to. > > I wanted to attach metadata about type, field arity etc in the > definition of the record type so that I could write some tools to do > intelligent conversion between record structures. >
I have a similar need, and decided to model a FooDefinition record as part of my domain. (regards), Pedro -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
