1. would be my favorite too. Multimethods are fine too, but may be a bit slow. 3. is the same as 2. while avoiding multimethods.
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 10:26 PM, Nicolas Oury <nicolas.o...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I would do for 1, but other would do differently I think. > Good thing with a multi-paradigm language. -- Moritz Ulrich Programmer, Student, Almost normal Guy http://www.google.com/profiles/ulrich.moritz -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
