> > > Hi BG, > It is a common mistake to think that callability, corresponding to the > clojure.lang.IFn interface, is part of the persistent map contract > (I've done it myself, as did many others a Conj labs :). It is not. It > is actually just a feature of clojure.lang.PersistentHashMap (and the > other clojure map implementations). > > While I get that part, I wonder why records do not implement IFn, it'd be convenient if they did.
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en