>
>
> Hi BG,
> It is a common mistake to think that callability, corresponding to the
> clojure.lang.IFn interface, is part of the persistent map contract
> (I've done it myself, as did many others a Conj labs :). It is not. It
> is actually just a feature of clojure.lang.PersistentHashMap (and the
> other clojure map implementations).
>
>
While I get that part, I wonder why records do not implement IFn, it'd be
convenient if they did.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

Reply via email to