No. We want to collect more information and do more comparisons before moving away from the recommended Java buffering.
Stu > Any chance of getting this in before 1.2? > > On Jun 25, 7:43 am, cageface <milese...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Thanks Stuart & Peter for following up on this. Now I can get back to >> plowing through this mountain of ldiff data with Clojure! > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your > first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
