Oh. I forgot. It could also be helpful to have an easy access (meta information, for example) to the fields (and their types) of a record type.
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 7:57 PM, Nicolas Oury <nicolas.o...@gmail.com> wrote: > I have been thinking of that too. > > The approach of extending with maps is great but lacks of access to > the content of the instance variables of the type. > > > (def Foo [bar] > > ) > > (extend > clever-automatic-construction > ) > > As far as I know, clever-automatic-construction cannot use bar in its > implementation. > Which might be a bit annoying, because you have to rely on the > interface of the implementor of one thing > to implement another interface. > Maybe creating a getBar automatically could help? > > Or there are other ways to work around that? > > Best, > Nicolas. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
