On Aug 12, 2:09 pm, Meikel Brandmeyer <m...@kotka.de> wrote: > it's for technical reasons. Clojure wll then generate classes without > a package, which causes them to be put in the default package. There > are problems/restrictions/issues with classes in the default package. > I'm not a JVM expert, so someone else might provide more details. I > just go with the "JVM doesn't like it. Don't do it."
You can't call anything in the default package from a regular package. But I think (ns foo) would compile into a foo package, so this wouldn't be a problem. Adam -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
