I am playing a bit with shapado (open source stackoverflow clone in ruby, I made an Esperanto QA site with it at demandoj.tk) and maybe it's an idea to create a clojure webdev shapado thus creating a fun to use self-documenting system and using the wikipages etc to provide more information of all separate projects...
For project specific stuff I think mailing lists are the best thing since sliced bread. However for newbie questions and documentation it gets messy quite quickly, so I think a QA site for all of the Clojure Webdev stuff might be nice. Weird idea? 2010/8/17 TIM MCIVER <tmci...@verizon.net>: > I'm new to Clojure and fairly new to FP in general. I'm trying to write a > web app in Clojure and I would definitely like to see something like that. > > Tim > > ________________________________ > From: Saul Hazledine <shaz...@gmail.com> > To: Clojure <clojure@googlegroups.com> > Sent: Tue, August 17, 2010 10:15:30 AM > Subject: Clojure Web Programming group? > > Hello, > Personally I really like the way web development in Clojure is > improving. Rather than huge frameworks there are different libraries > that are coming together to form a useful toolset. Even the framework > Conjure is lightweight and using general purpose libraries under the > hood. > > One drawback of this library approach though is that it is daunting to > beginners. Not only do newcomers have to choose what tools they want > to use they have to find a way to fit them together. > > I've noticed that each library is being supported in their own group/ > forum. This is fine for the well used libraries but less mainstream > libraries have groups with little traffic. Also, since libraries need > to interoperate it would be nice to have a place where library users > and library developers are aware of other web development going on. > > I have developed three small libraries, mostly useful for web work, > that could be of interest to other people. However, I don't want to > start three different google groups which not only see no traffic but > also separate some tools which can be best applied together. Because > of this I was going to just have one group that supported all three. > > One idea I had though was to go one step further and start a Clojure > web development group so that other developers of small libraries and > users of them could go to one place for support and discussion. Would > this be uncool or would it be useful? > > Saul > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your > first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your > first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -- Linux-user #496644 (http://counter.li.org) - first touch of linux in 2004 Demandoj en aŭ pri Esperanto? Questions about Esperanto? Vragen over Esperanto? Perguntas sobre o Esperanto? - http://demandoj.tk -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
