I've been programming in large OO applications since about 1993. One problem is that a lot of useful code gets buried way deep in an OO class hierarchy, where you are forced to create lots of intermediate objects just to get to the useful functions.
This really hurts the re-usability, unit testabilty, and a lot of other ilities. On Sep 3, 12:50 am, vishy <vishalsod...@gmail.com> wrote: > It is better to have 100 functions operate on one data structure than > 10 functions on > 10 data structures. > -- Alan Perlis > > Why so? How is it advantageous? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
