I liked it. Easy to grok. I had some vague idea that monads are like "overloading the pipe operator in a function pipeline", but now it's much clearer. I know some abstract algebra, though not category theory.
I skipped the proofs, didn't care about those. -- Eivind Magnus Hvidevold Cell: +47 911 89 408 http://www.facebook.com/mangoblueberry On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 2:21 AM, David Cabana <[email protected]> wrote: > I had too much time on my hands, and put together a Clojure-based > monad tutorial. If that kind of thing is your cup of tea, I'd love to > get some feedback on it. Here's the link > http://erl.nfshost.com/2010/09/05/bind-unit-and-all-that-2/ > > David > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > your first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<clojure%[email protected]> > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
