Hi Stu,

I like your "open dispatch club" ;-)

Yes, after some thinking this is rather clear - every single something
had to be scanned whether it implements a protocol; ehm, and rescanned
when a new protocol is defined.

Well, I drop that request ;-)

Thank you for the illumination,

alux

On 8 Sep., 16:05, Stuart Halloway <stuart.hallo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The first rule of open dispatch club is "you never get a complete list of 
> club members." :-) This is also true for e.g. Java interfaces: there is no 
> API call for "reflectively show me all implementers of this interface."
>
> The IDE/tools use case is a real one, but it will need to be solved in the 
> same way IDEs currently find all implementers of an interface: the 
> information is in the environment, not in the core of the language.
>
> Stu
>
> > Hello Stuart, sorry to answer so late, got holidays, happily.
>
> > I tried to use the function extenders to list the implementations, so
> > to say, of the protocol.
> > That was playing around, not a use case taken from reality. If I try
> > to make a use case up, hm, I may need it in the development
> > environment, to find functions to ponder their use.
>
> > Regards, alux
>
> > On 3 Sep., 16:05, Stuart Halloway <stuart.hallo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Let's back up: what are you trying to do with 'extenders'?
>
> >> Stu
>
> >>> Yes, thats what I see.
> >>> I just dont think this is very sensible.
>
> >>> Thank you Meikel!
>
> >>> Greetings, alux
>
> >>> On 3 Sep., 13:10, Meikel Brandmeyer <m...@kotka.de> wrote:
> >>>> Hi,
>
> >>>> On 3 Sep., 12:49, alux <alu...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> >>>>> shouldnt the type x be listed a extender of xx here? Or why not?
>
> >>>> No. It shows up if you actually use extend to the extend the protocol
> >>>> to the type.
>
> >>>> Sincerely
> >>>> Meikel
>
> >>> --
> >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> >>> Groups "Clojure" group.
> >>> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
> >>> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with 
> >>> your first post.
> >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >>> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> >>> For more options, visit this group at
> >>>http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
>
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > Groups "Clojure" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
> > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with 
> > your first post.
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> > For more options, visit this group at
> >http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

Reply via email to