Sorry, Google posted this before I was done. Anyway, it looks like:
(defn juxt
([f g h & fs]
(let [fs (list* f g h fs)]
...)))
Is there a reason to do that instead of the following?
(defn juxt
([& fs]
...))
On Sep 8, 11:02 am, Alan <a...@malloys.org> wrote:
> I happened to be looking at the source for clojure.core/juxt, and I
> was a little surprised by the way it handles 4+ arguments
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
