Thanks for clearing that up for me everyone. So the REPL itself acts
like a consumer of lazy sequences? Is there some logic behind that? I
guess I would have expected that the REPL would just return a
reference to a lazy expression rather than evaluate it.

Thanks,

-Ranjit


On Sep 13, 2:06 pm, Alan <a...@malloys.org> wrote:
> Ranjit, try the following to see it in action even at the REPL:
>
> (def xt (make-array Float/TYPE 3 3))
>
> (def myloop (for [x (range 3) y (range 3)] (aset xt x y 1)))
>
> (aget xt 1 1) ;; xt hasn't been changed
>
> myloop ;; force REPL to de-lazify
>
> (aget xt 1 1) ;; changed now
>
> On Sep 13, 9:28 am, Mark Nutter <manutte...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Erg, gmail hiccup. Started to say if you try to use it in code that's
> > *not* being called from the REPL, you'll be scratching your head
> > trying to figure out why aset never gets called.
>
> > Mark
>
> > On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 12:27 PM, Mark Nutter <manutte...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > The REPL automatically realizes the lazy sequence in the process of
> > > printing it out, but if you try to us
>
> > > On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 11:07 AM, Ranjit <rjcha...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> Thanks Armando for catching my stupid mistake. That fixed everything.
>
> > >> Meikel, I'm not sure I understand what you're saying. When I evaluate
> > >> this in the REPL
>
> > >> (for [x (range 2) y (range 2)] (aset xt x y (+ x y)))
> > >> (aget xt 0 0)
> > >> (aget xt 1 1)
>
> > >> I get back 0 and 2 as I expect. Isn't the call to aset consuming the
> > >> lazy sequence?
>
> > >> Thanks.
>
> > >> On Sep 13, 11:00 am, Meikel Brandmeyer <m...@kotka.de> wrote:
> > >>> Hi,
>
> > >>> On 13 Sep., 15:07, Ranjit Chacko <rjcha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > >>> >     (for [x (range 3) y (range 3)] (aset xt x y 1))
>
> > >>> Note that that this will not do what you think it does. for creates a
> > >>> lazy sequence which is thrown away immediately. So the aset calls are
> > >>> never done. for is a list comprehension, not a looping construct.
> > >>> Replace for with doseq. As a rule of thumb: side-effects => command
> > >>> starting in "do".
>
> > >>> Sincerely
> > >>> Meikel
>
> > >> --
> > >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > >> Groups "Clojure" group.
> > >> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
> > >> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with 
> > >> your first post.
> > >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > >> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> > >> For more options, visit this group at
> > >>http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

Reply via email to