2010/9/21 Phil Hagelberg <p...@hagelb.org> > On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 10:07 PM, Kevin Downey <redc...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 7:33 PM, Robert McIntyre <r...@mit.edu> wrote: > >> If it is to be deprecated, is there a "correct" way of achieving the > >> same result (having things automatically loaded when you create the > >> repl?) > > > > user.clj is very useful, I'd rather keep it. > > Agreed; there are some neat tricks that would be really hard to do without > it. >
Which ones ? It's a true question, 'cause I never used it, so maybe I'm missing something interesting. Anyway, if it provides interesting features, would it be possible to find a "better" way of providing the same level of features, with the same level of simplicity, but in a more "robust" way when facing the case of a project using several libs which may or may not have left some user.clj in their default package ? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
