As a side note, I notice that in clojure 1.3, bit-shift-left now
provides wraparound logic with no warning if the first input is a long
(as opposed to a bigint).

Wouldn't it be more consistent if bit-shift-left provided an overflow
error for long inputs that shift so much they overflow?  Should there
also be an unchecked-bit-shift-left and a bit-shift-left' ?

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

Reply via email to