Recently, I've been coding functions that take a map as follows. I
feel like it is slightly messy, though, and was wondering if any one
else could think of a reason not to do it:
(defn blah
([blah-map]
;; do stuff with blah-map)
([key val & {:as blah-map}]
(blah (assoc blah-map key val))))
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
