Hi, On 11 Okt., 12:26, Ulises <ulises.cerv...@gmail.com> wrote:
> so in theory one could have a symbol foo bound to a var bar? Eh. No. I don't think so. The Var has a name and the symbol has a name. And an unqualified symbol is resolved to the "closest" Var with the same name (conveniently derefing the var to get its contents). This might be in the same namespace or in a different namespace which was :use'd. I'm still not convinced that symbols are "bound" to a Var. Sincerely Meikel -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
