Indeed. I have emailed him again asking for further clarification (and asked for what license it is released under, if any - though I think its extremely important that it is released under some specific and publicly disclosed terms).
The only other discussion on this issue that I could find was here: http://groups.google.com/group/clojure/browse_thread/thread/7f179c79f0d0bb3e but, while somebody asked about the license, a distinctive answer was never given. Hopefully he can solve this once and for all and prevent any future confusion. I think it would be a good idea to put this information up on http://clojure.org/license On 21 November 2010 22:33, Ken Wesson <kwess...@gmail.com> wrote: > I think the whole mess is in need of sorting out, and that Rich Hickey > is going to have to be the one to do that. I think there should be *a* > logo usable for any site that's primarily about Clojure or > Clojure-developed software; whether this is the blue-and-green-lambda > logo we've been discussing or some other logo would be up to Rich to > decide. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your > first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
