Hi Robert,
 What I had posted before was half-baked buggy code .. the following gist
has a few more helper debug macros
https://gist.github.com/718725

<https://gist.github.com/718725>This code was written when I was trying to
learn writing macros .. so any criticism is very welcome.
Thanks
Sunil.

On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 11:06 PM, Robert McIntyre <r...@mit.edu> wrote:

> cool!  Although I think with-seperator should be spelled "with-separator"
>
> --Robert McIntyre
>
> On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 9:13 AM, Sunil S Nandihalli
> <sunil.nandiha...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I just tried to re-write with-seperator without using the symbol-macros
> from
> > macro-utils and it seems to work fine ..
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 1:27 PM, Sunil S Nandihalli
> > <sunil.nandiha...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hello everybody,
> >>  I was trying to learn to write clojure macros and the code is posted
> here
> >> in the following link
> >> https://gist.github.com/715047
> >> There are basically three macros
> >> 1. with-seperator - a zero argument macro and is supposed to just draw a
> >> line to indicate beginning and ending of the execution of the body.
> >> 2. display-local-bindings - a function to print the local bindings in
> the
> >> lexical scope where the macro is called
> >> 3. letd - a helper macro to print the values of all the bindings
>  followed
> >> by printing of the local bindings using display-local-bindings
> >> The letd macro as posted works as expected but without the seperation
> line
> >> .  It is supposed to print the seperation line when I uncomment line 14
> and
> >> comment line 15 but some how this is causing the &env variable
> automatically
> >> passed with every macro to be nil display-local-binding .. but the I
> feel it
> >> is not the case .. can somebody help me understand this. This was an
> >> exercise to learn macro writing than to writing a letd debugging helper
> >> function..
> >> Thanks,
> >> Sunil.
> >
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > Groups "Clojure" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
> > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
> your
> > first post.
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<clojure%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com>
> > For more options, visit this group at
> > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Clojure" group.
> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
> your first post.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<clojure%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com>
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

Reply via email to