Hi, From today, I will not receive updates from this group, so if anyone cares to answer this question, please send me an email: dil...@gmail.com. I do think that this is an important question to many people that liked a lot the Clojure concurrency model but cannot use Clojure in their day to day programs.
Cheers, Dilvan On Nov 22, 12:58 pm, Dilvan <dil...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > During the discussions of the topic "Jython Interoperability > problem", > Mikhail Kryshen suggested implementations of Clojure data structures > outside Clojure: > > >Clojure's data structures modified for use outside of Clojure: > >http://github.com/krukow/clj-ds > >Persistent analogue of the Java Collections Framework: > >http://code.google.com/p/pcollections/ > > I've been using the Clojure libraries (immutable collections and > Refs) in Java programs (a version of the Manchester OWL-API). Reading > the documentation for the Clojure replacements suggested by Mikhail, > they imply that the implementations inside the official Clojure > libraries are inefficient (in terms of speed and memory) if used in > Java only applications (no Clojure code) AND that, in the future, they > may demand that all of the Clojure machinery be loaded with them. Is > there any official view/police about this issue? > > The question I need to answer is: Should I keep using the Clojure > libraries in my programs or migrate them to some other implementation > of immutable collections + Refs (STM) + (maybe) actors? > > Advices are welcomed :-) > > DIlvanMoreira -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
