Thanks Ken,
I didn't realize I could test it so easily. But I would like it to ideally
return the same collection .. Shouldn't be hard to write a wrapper .. But I
think it should be the default behaviour.
Thanks again,
Sunil.
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 7:05 AM, Ken Wesson <kwess...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 8:07 PM, Sunil S Nandihalli
> <sunil.nandiha...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hello everybody,
> > I have a small doubt. Suppose
> > (def s #{1 2 3 4 5 6})
> > (set s)
> > will calling set on an existing set shortcircuit the call and return the
> > same set or would it create a new one? I would like to extend the
> question
> > to hash-map and vec..
> > thanks,
> > Sunil.
>
> Why not just test it for yourself?
>
> user=> (def s #{1 2 3 4 5 6})
> #'user/s
> user=> (= s (set s))
> true
> user=> (identical? s (set s))
> false
>
> Looks like it creates a new object, in the specific case of sets.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Clojure" group.
> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
> your first post.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<clojure%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com>
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
