Hi, Am 16.12.2010 um 14:50 schrieb Jay Fields:
> In general you should prefer doseq because it doesn't hold on to the head, > correct? dorun does the same. But it constructs a lazy sequence of return values which is thrown away immediately. This is very ugly and wasteful. Doing some microbenchmarking one might even see, that doseq is a little faster than (dorun (map ...)). But that isn't maybe not the main issue. Maybe this is just philosophical. Sincerely Meikel -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
