That's brilliant. Has anyone considered targeting clojure for LaTeX3? Numerical support for one would be simplified, since LaTeX3 just uses actual rational numbers as its default instead longs or ints or whatever.
This could be big, guys! --Robert McIntyre On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 12:19 PM, Ken Wesson <kwess...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 11:38 AM, Daniel Werner > <daniel.d.wer...@googlemail.com> wrote: >> On 18 December 2010 16:29, Ken Wesson <kwess...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> "Once Java 7 is out" is starting to seem like "once LaTeX3 is out" or >> >> Oh, you haven't heard the news yet? LaTeX3 has already been superseded >> anyway: >> >> http://river-valley.tv/tug-2010/an-earthshaking-announcement > > Are you crazy? I'm not watching a 34-minute video to find out what can > surely be explained in a page or two of text that will take me two > minutes to read. > > For the most part the online video revolution seems to be a good > thing. But when long videos substitute for short text or HTML > documents then there is a problem. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your > first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
