[Going ever further off topic....]

On Sat, 18 Dec 2010 20:52:09 -0500
John Sanda <john.sa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 3:10 PM, Alyssa Kwan <alyssa.c.k...@gmail.com>wrote:
> > I'd like to unit test my html output for well-formedness.  What's an
> > easy way to test it for HTML5 validity?  Are there good Clojure libs
> > for this?  I only need to check for validity, not parse.
> You might want to a look at http://xmlunit.sourceforge.net/. I've neither
> used it with Clojure nor for HTML validation, but I have used a good bit for
> general purpose XML validation. I was pretty happy with it.

That (well, something like it) was my initial thought. But there's no
schema/DTD for HTML5, so you can't use a traditional validator like
the Validator class to get even that much of a check.

For that matter, HTML5 includes things that can't be expressed in
SGML, much less XML. The spec explicitly states that a conformance
checker that just does a DTD-based validation is not a conforming
conformance checker according to the specification.

This may be why there's no DTD yet: the spec is under development, so
providing a DTD would just encourage people to use DTD-based
validators instead of writing the custom code required to properly
check conformance. Hopefully, when it's finished they'll publish a
DTD, so conformance checkers can be written that assume a valid
document.

        <mike
-- 
Mike Meyer <m...@mired.org>             http://www.mired.org/consulting.html
Independent Network/Unix/Perforce consultant, email for more information.

O< ascii ribbon campaign - stop html mail - www.asciiribbon.org

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

Reply via email to